Google addresses the challenges of creating AI-generated content without human input in its Search Quality Rater Guidelines, placing such texts alongside duplicates, plagiarism, and copied material
In a surprising move, Google appears to be turning its back on AI-generated content – at least the low-effort kind. According to the latest update to the Search Quality Rater Guidelines (January 2025), content created by generative AI tools should now receive the Lowest qualityrating.
New AI content guidelines from Google
The change was confirmed by Google’s John Mueller during Search Central Live in Madrid, and shared by Aleyda Solis on her LinkedIn profile.
It seems to be crucial as, for the first time, Google finally defines “Generative AI” in its official documents – recognizing its potential benefits but also highlighting its risks of misuse.
But is that something entirely new or different? Well, not exactly – we’re all aware that original and high-quality content was always the case for Google, and that misused AI will bring low-quality results. This case is simply important because Google for the first time addresses the problems that AI-generated content may cause.
Search Quality Rater Guidelines update — January 2025. Top highlights
One major update is in Section 4.6.6., where Google clearly states that if most or all of a page’s main content is copied, paraphrased, or generated by automation or AI, and offers little to no effort, originality, or value – it deserves the Lowest rating. Citing sources isn’t enough to avoid this rate.
Google wants it to be clear: what matters is the value for the user, not how easy it is to produce. Finding the silver lining in optimizing the efforts of both AI and humans is becoming increasingly important.
Ania Bitner
Content Team Leader
What’s especially interesting — Google has also expanded its definition of spam, introducing new problem areas like “scaled content abuse” (mass-produced low-quality content) and “expired domain abuse” (repurposing old domains for SEO tricks). Overstated author credentials and misleading page designs also face stricter penalties, which seems to be crucial in terms of E-E-A-T and reliability.
Google’s priority is quite clear: real value for real users.
An editor by profession. She has been working in marketing for the past 5 years — first in the social media teams of Krakow publishing houses, then in SEO and copywriting, until she finally decided to excel in content marketing and combine her organizational skills with her extraordinary linguistic sense of style. She works on content projects at Delante, conducting content audits, arranging content plans, and creating content for the most demanding clients. Privately, a cat behaviorist, future dog trainer, and a lover of tattoos and RPG games.
An editor by profession. She has been working in marketing for the past 5 years — first in the social media teams of Krakow publishing houses, then in SEO and copywriting, until she finally decided to excel in content marketing and combine her organizational skills with her extraordinary linguistic sense of style. She works on content projects at Delante, conducting content audits, arranging content plans, and creating content for the most demanding clients. Privately, a cat behaviorist, future dog trainer, and a lover of tattoos and RPG games.